Use ChatGPT Edu, Copilot Chat, and Microsoft 365 Copilot to speed up the work you already do
The biggest time savings come from the repetitive middle of a task.
Best when the work is already in a Microsoft file — a Word doc to rewrite, an Outlook thread to summarize, an Excel sheet to analyze. Sees the file you're in; respects Microsoft 365 permissions.
Protected web-based drafting, summarizing, and brainstorming with Enterprise Data Protection — when you don't need a reusable GPT.
Open-ended drafting, summarizing pasted text, file analysis, and reusable assistants. Use GPT-5.5 when it appears in your model picker; otherwise the current default.
| Role | Task you already do | Where AI helps |
|---|---|---|
| Research | Turn a specific aims paragraph into a lay summary for a community board; summarize reviewer comments into a response checklist | Word Copilot · ChatGPT Edu |
| Research | First-pass summary of 3–5 abstracts into a comparison table for a team meeting | ChatGPT Edu (paste text) |
| Teaching | Draft a course announcement from bullet points; turn lecture notes into a study guide; tighten rubric language | Word Copilot · Copilot Chat |
| Admin | Summarize a 12-message committee thread into decisions and action items; draft the reply | Outlook Copilot |
| Admin | Sanity-check a small spreadsheet: totals, flags, a quick trend chart | Excel Copilot |
All five show up as worked examples in today's hands-on segments.
Verification, disclosure, and over-reliance — what accountability means in daily work.
AI can fabricate facts, stats, and citations that read as authoritative. Check anything going into a real document or decision against the source — especially numbers and references.
For official work products, external communications, and anything research-related, note that AI assisted — per Drexel's AI policy and your unit's expectations.
Speed is the selling point and the trap. If AI does all the drafting and thinking, your skill and your voice both erode. Keep your judgment in the loop.
If you can’t open it, you can’t cite it.
Three worked examples in Office, then one real task in ChatGPT Edu. Demo files are on the workshop page.
Pick the track that matches your week. Each has a demo file if you didn't bring your own — the next three slides walk through one worked example per track.
Research: turn a study description into a lay summary for a community advisory board, then draft a next-steps section.
Teaching/committee: pull the decisions and action items out of a 6-message curriculum-committee thread, then draft the reply.
Admin: summarize a seminar-attendance sheet, flag high cost-per-attendee rows with a formula, chart the trend.
Pedestrian injuries remain a leading cause of traffic death in U.S. cities, and risk is concentrated at a small share of intersections. This study will link citywide crash records with street-level imagery to identify built-environment features — crossing distance, vehicle speeds, lighting, signal timing — associated with severe pedestrian injury at signalized intersections. Results will produce a ranked list of modifiable intersection features for city transportation partners…
Watch for: does the lay version keep the numbers accurate? That's your verify step.
M. Rivera: …proposing we move EPI 570 to fall and add the data-visualization module. Thoughts before Friday?
J. Chen: Fall works if the lab sections don't collide with BST 555. Also — who owns the syllabus update?
M. Rivera: Agreed on fall, pending the registrar check. Syllabus update: can you take it, with a July 20 draft?
+ 3 more messages…
Watch for: did it invent a decision that was never actually made? Threads are where AI over-summarizes.
| Month | Department | Attendees | Cost ($) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | EOH | 34 | 310 |
| Sep 2025 | Epi & Biostat | 51 | 445 |
| Oct 2025 | EOH | 29 | 402 |
| Oct 2025 | HMP | 22 | 295 |
| … Sep–Jun, three departments | |||
Watch for: check the flag formula against one row by hand before you trust the column.
Run one task you actually need this week. Structure the prompt with PTCF — here it is filled in for the lay-summary task:
Abstract 1. A citywide study of nighttime pedestrian crashes and street lighting upgrades…
Abstract 2. Speed-limit reductions on urban arterials and severe-injury rates…
Abstract 3. Computer-vision audit of crosswalk quality across 2,000 intersections…
One step takes you from raw material to a product you can nearly send. The "make it a table" move works on anything with structure.
Then do the final edit yourself. What you changed is the part that needed your expertise.
Once a prompt works, strip the specifics and leave placeholders. Keep these in a running note — next week you fill in blanks instead of starting over.
Microsoft 365 Copilot for work inside Office files; Copilot Chat for protected web chat; ChatGPT Edu for open drafting and reusable assistants.
Next: Workshop 3 — Collaboration on Projects. Shared Projects, custom GPTs, and a team prompt library.